Globe Map Shells 3D | I. Unification II. Deductions III. Lattice Thesis Synopsis Abstract | Cycles Timeline Research | All

IMPACT PERIODICITY: 36 Myr FUNDAMENTAL MODE

Large impact events (>40 km craters) plotted against a 36 million year cycle. 9 of 11 events fall within ±4 Myr of predicted cycle windows — ±11% phase accuracy across 580 million years.
Impact (confirmed)
Impact (proposed)
Flood basalt
Mass extinction
36 Myr cycle
Projected window

Fundamental Period

36 Myr
Best fit to 11 large impacts over 580 Ma. Consistent with solar oscillation through the galactic plane (Rampino 2015).

Current Phase

30 Myr in
83% through the current cycle. Next window opens in ~6 Myr. Last cycle-matched impact: Popigai/Chesapeake (~35.5 Ma).

Next Window

~6 Myr
Cycle 0 predicted at 0 Ma ± 4 Myr. We are inside the tail end of a window — or the start of the next approach.

Holocene Sub-Cycle

~4,000 yr
Younger Dryas (12.8 kBP), 8.2 kyr event, Burckle (~4.8 kBP), 4.2 kyr collapse. Harmonic overtone of the fundamental?
Impact Age (Ma) Diameter Cycle # Predicted Residual Bhole BH dist

HOLOCENE SUB-CYCLE (~4,000 yr harmonic)

FROM PERIODICITY TO THE DERIVATION CHAIN

The 36 Myr cycle is the temporal signature that first demanded a geometric explanation. Impacts don't just recur in time — they recur at the same geographic nodes (see Cycles). That spatial clustering led to the discovery of the lattice, and the lattice led to the derivation chain:

Φ = ∂tΦ → Φ(t) = Cet → R = 1 + 1/R → R = φ → an = an−1 + an−2 → an ~ Aφn → π = P5·arccos(Φ/P2) → dm/dn = φm−n → 1 axiom

The spatial quantisation dm/dn = φm−n explains why astronomical distances cluster on φ-shells. The geographic lattice — the 210-gon projected from Giza — explains why impacts cluster at specific nodes on Earth's surface. The temporal periodicity shown on this page is the third thread: the rhythm at which the lattice activates.

Full derivation: Paper I · Distance test: Paper II · Geographic proof: Paper III