Concentric rings at 3·φⁿ degrees from each pole (n = −1 to 6). This is the framework’s distance quantisation: sites should cluster at shell boundaries, not uniformly. The base angle 3° is not arbitrary — it is the primorial residue of 210/70.

22 great circles from Giza at bearings G_n = (n·137.508°) mod 360. The golden angle 137.508° = 360/φ² is the angular quantum. Combined with φ-shells, these define a coordinate grid with no free parameters. Of 109 ancient sites tested, the majority fall within 3° of a G-bearing.

109 sites across six continents — Gobekli Tepe, Angkor Wat, Teotihuacan, Nazca, and others — plotted against the shell+bearing grid. Dual G-bearing hits (within 5° of a Giza line AND an EI line) appear gold. The Chichén Itzá Maya wheel shows the 20-day Tzolk’in cycle also follows golden-angle spacing.

Each known black hole has a distance (convertible to a φ-shell) and a sky position (convertible to a G-bearing from Giza). Projecting shell∩bearing onto the globe yields a surface point. 4 confirmations land within 500 km of major sites (M31→Giza, Markarian 231→Derinkuyu, QSO J0313→Nile, V4641 Sgr→Easter Island). 16 predictions mark where un-surveyed BH projections fall.

Great circles from Giza toward Markarian 231, M31, and QSO J0313 — extended across the globe, they pass through additional ancient sites (Derinkuyu, Teotihuacán, Luxor). The Orion Belt stars (Alnitak, Alnilam, Mintaka) projected onto the surface trace a line parallel to the Nile — matching the Giza–Orion correlation at framework-derived coordinates.

76 astronomical objects (black holes, stars, radio sources) classified by divisor index k. Distance to each object divided by k yields a Fibonacci number within measured error. Colour encodes k-value: k=62 (RITO), k=9, k=3, k=11, etc. Squares = radio sources, large spheres = black holes, small = stars.

Six ahu platforms on Easter Island. Ahu Akivi’s 7 moai face 262° (seaward) — the reverse bearing 75.7° points to Giza (16,161 km). Ahu Vinapu faces 45° — bearing to Stonehenge is 44.6° (0.4° error). Ahu Tahai faces 90° toward Mohenjo-daro. Red lines = sea-facing, cyan = inland. Dashed extensions show the full great-circle path to each target.

The same φ-shell + golden-angle grid, centred on Easter Island instead of Giza. Sites that fall on both grids simultaneously (dual-hit, shown as gold octahedra) cannot be explained by either grid alone — they require the four-pole geometry. The Giza–EI axis great circle and the 22 EI G-bearings are drawn in teal.

Sites sharing the same G-bearing from Giza are connected — they sit on the same golden-angle corridor. Gold lines = combined error <3°, orange = <6°. Red arcs connect Easter Island ahu platforms to distant sites their moai face toward. If today’s Tzolk’in bearing from Chichén Itzá aligns with a G-line, a red octahedron marks the resonance.

The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: fragments arriving from the Fornax A corridor (~12,800 ya) produce antipodal shockwave focusing. Impact craters and antipodal volcanic features align on framework bearings. The simulation models shallow-water tsunami propagation with Φ≡c≡g lattice physics: gravity is modulated by φ-shell proximity from all four poles, and wave speed is enhanced along golden-angle bearing corridors. Blue overlay = lattice gravity field.

Convergence nodes are eigenmode intersections — points where multiple shell+bearing lines cross. The Fornax A trajectory (purple) traces the infall corridor from 62 Mly. These layers show the framework’s predictions for geologically significant points not yet surveyed.